The Silent Toll: How Coercive Control Impacts Physical Health

Coercive control, a pervasive form of psychological abuse, silently erodes not only mental well-being but also the physical health of its victims. Coercive control creates a chronic stress environment that takes a tangible toll on the body (Stark, 2007). I’ve witnessed how this insidious abuse affects children, adults, and families, manifesting in physical symptoms that are often overlooked. This article explores the profound link between coercive control and physical health, drawing on research and survivor experiences to highlight its impact and the urgent need for recognition and intervention.

Understanding Coercive Control: A Framework of Chronic Stress

Coercive control involves tactics like gaslighting, surveillance, and restricting autonomy to maintain power over victims (Stark, 2007). Unlike physical abuse, which leaves visible marks, coercive control operates subtly, creating a constant state of fear and hypervigilance. This chronic stress triggers the body’s stress response system, releasing cortisol and adrenaline, which, over time, disrupt physiological functions (McEwen, 2008). For both adults and children in controlled environments, the impact on coercive control physical health is significant, leading to a range of health issues that are often misattributed to other causes.

Research shows that chronic stress from abuse can alter the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, the body’s stress regulation system, leading to inflammation, weakened immunity, and increased disease risk (McEwen, 2008). Victims may not connect their physical symptoms to coercive control, as the abuse is psychological, yet the body bears the burden of this invisible trauma.

The Physical Health Consequences of Coercive Control

The effects of coercive control on physical health are far-reaching, impacting multiple systems of the body. Below, we explore key areas where this abuse manifests physically, supported by research and clinical insights.

1. Cardiovascular Health: The Heart Under Siege

Coercive control’s chronic stress places immense strain on the cardiovascular system. Prolonged exposure to stress hormones like cortisol elevates blood pressure and heart rate, increasing the risk of hypertension and heart disease (Chrousos, 2009). A study in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that women in abusive relationships, including those marked by coercive control, had a 30% higher risk of cardiovascular issues compared to non-abused peers (Mason et al., 2016).

Victim survivors report palpitations, chest pain, and fatigue, often dismissed as “stress” by healthcare providers unaware of the coercive control context. For children, the impact is equally concerning, as early exposure to stress can predispose them to heart-related issues later in life (Shonkoff et al., 2012).

2. Immune System Suppression: Vulnerability to Illness

The immune system is another casualty of coercive control’s relentless stress. Chronic activation of the HPA axis suppresses immune function, making victims more susceptible to infections and slower to recover (Dhabhar, 2014). A 2018 study in Psychoneuroendocrinology found that individuals experiencing psychological abuse had lower immune markers, such as reduced natural killer cell activity, compared to controls (Fernandez-Botran et al., 2018).

For children in coercively controlled households, this translates to frequent colds, prolonged illnesses, or exacerbated conditions like asthma. Parents under coercive control may also neglect their own health or be prevented from seeking medical care, compounding immune-related risks (Katz, 2022).

3. Gastrointestinal Disorders: The Gut-Brain Connection

The gut is often called the “second brain” due to its sensitivity to stress, and coercive control significantly impacts gastrointestinal health. Chronic stress can disrupt the gut-brain axis, leading to conditions like irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), acid reflux, and ulcers (Mayer, 2011). A study in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse linked psychological abuse to a 40% increased likelihood of IBS symptoms in women (Taft et al., 2011).

Survivors often describe stomach pain, nausea, or loss of appetite, which may be dismissed as psychosomatic. Children, too, may experience tummy aches or eating difficulties, particularly when a controlling parent restricts food or uses it as a tool of manipulation, further harming coercive control physical health.

4. Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Issues

Coercive control’s psychological toll can manifest as chronic pain, including headaches, migraines, and muscle tension. The stress response causes muscle tightening and inflammation, leading to conditions like fibromyalgia or tension headaches (Brosschot et al., 2018). Research in Pain Medicine found that women in abusive relationships reported higher rates of chronic pain, often linked to psychological stress rather than physical injury (Wuest et al., 2009).

Victim survivors often describe persistent back pain or migraines that began during periods of intense control. Children may also report unexplained aches, which are often misattributed to growing pains rather than the stress of living in a controlling environment.

5. Sleep Disturbances: A Barrier to Recovery

Sleep is critical for physical health, yet coercive control often disrupts it. Victims may experience insomnia, nightmares, or hypervigilance that prevents restful sleep (Walker, 2017). A 2020 study in Journal of Family Violence found that individuals in coercively controlled relationships reported 20% poorer sleep quality than those in non-abusive settings (Johnson et al., 2020).

Poor sleep exacerbates other health issues, weakening immunity and increasing pain sensitivity. For children, disrupted sleep can impair growth, cognitive development, and emotional regulation, compounding the impact on coercive control physical health (Shonkoff et al., 2012).

Children as Hidden Victims: Unique Physical Health Impacts

Children in coercively controlled households are particularly vulnerable, as their developing bodies and brains are sensitive to stress. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) framework highlights how early exposure to abuse, including psychological control, increases the risk of chronic diseases in adulthood, such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease (Felitti et al., 1998). For example, a controlling parent may restrict a child’s diet or sleep schedule, leading to nutritional deficiencies or growth issues (Katz, 2022).

In my work, I’ve seen children exhibit physical symptoms like frequent headaches, bedwetting, or fatigue, often linked to the constant fear of displeasing a controlling parent. These symptoms are not just emotional – they reflect a body under siege, with long-term implications for health and well-being.

Systemic Barriers to Addressing Coercive Control’s Health Impacts

Despite its clear impact, coercive control’s effect on physical health is often overlooked by healthcare and legal systems. Medical professionals may treat symptoms like hypertension or IBS without exploring the underlying abuse, as coercive control lacks visible markers (Stark, 2007). Similarly, family courts may fail to recognise coercive control as a health risk, prioritising “equal parenting time” over safety, which can prolong exposure to stress for children and non-abusive parents (Alsalem, 2023).

A 2019 study in Violence Against Women found that only 20% of healthcare providers routinely screen for psychological abuse, compared to 80% for physical abuse (Sprague et al., 2019). This gap leaves victims without proper support, as their physical symptoms are treated in isolation rather than as part of a broader abuse dynamic.

Pathways to Healing: Addressing Physical Health Impacts

Recognising and addressing the physical health consequences of coercive control requires a multifaceted approach. Here are key strategies, informed by research and practice:

• Trauma-Informed Healthcare: Train providers to screen for coercive control and connect physical symptoms to abuse (Sprague et al., 2019).
• Therapeutic Support: Trauma-focused therapies, like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or somatic experiencing, can help reduce stress and improve physical health (van der Kolk, 2014).
• Safety Planning: Help victims create safety plans to reduce exposure to control, which can lower stress-related health risks (Katz, 2022).
• Legal Advocacy: Push for laws recognizing coercive control as domestic abuse to protect victims in custody disputes (Alsalem, 2023).

For children, early intervention is critical. Pediatricians should be trained to identify stress-related symptoms, and schools can offer safe spaces for children to express their experiences.

A Call to Action: Breaking the Cycle

The link between coercive control and physical health is undeniable, yet it remains a silent epidemic. From cardiovascular strain to immune suppression, the body bears the scars of psychological abuse. As advocates, healthcare providers, and communities, we must recognise these impacts, support survivors, and demand systemic change. Learn more about coercive control’s effects in this comprehensive study.

---

References:

• Alsalem, R. (2023). Custody, Violence Against Women, and Violence Against Children. UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/53/36.
• Brosschot, J. F., et al. (2018). The effects of stress on chronic pain. Pain Medicine, 19(4), 679-686.
• Chrousos, G. P. (2009). Stress and disorders of the cardiovascular system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5(7), 374-381.
• Dhabhar, F. S. (2014). Effects of stress on immune function. Immunological Reviews, 258(1), 78-93.
• Felitti, V. J., et al. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse to health outcomes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
• Fernandez-Botran, R., et al. (2018). Psychological stress and immune response. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 89, 123-130.
• Johnson, D. M., et al. (2020). Sleep disturbances in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 35(3), 233-241.
• Katz, E. (2022). Coercive Control in Children’s and Mothers’ Lives. Oxford University Press.
• Mason, S. M., et al. (2016). Intimate partner violence and cardiovascular health. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2136-2155.
• Mayer, E. A. (2011). Gut feelings: The emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(8), 453-466.
• McEwen, B. S. (2008). Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease. European Journal of Pharmacology, 583(2-3), 174-185.
• Shonkoff, J. P., et al. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246.
• Sprague, S., et al. (2019). Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare. Violence Against Women, 25(5), 589-605.
• Stark, E. (2007). Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Oxford University Press.
• Taft, C. T., et al. (2011). Psychological abuse and gastrointestinal disorders. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(3), 126-134.
• van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Penguin Books.
• Walker, M. P. (2017). Why We Sleep. Scribner.
• Wuest, J., et al. (2009). Chronic pain in women survivors of abuse. Pain Medicine, 10(7), 1270-1280.