What is Coercive Control

The term “coercive control” has increasingly entered public discourse, yet its insidious nature remains widely misunderstood. It is not merely an act of domestic violence, but a pervasive, systematic pattern of behaviour that robs an individual of their freedom, autonomy, and sense of self. Far from the visible scars of physical abuse, coercive control leaves deep, psychological wounds, often isolating the victim within an invisible prison built by their abuser.

Imagine trying to explain a spider’s web to someone who has only ever seen a single strand. Each individual thread might seem harmless on its own, but it’s the intricate, deliberate weaving of countless strands that creates a powerful, inescapable trap. Coercive control operates much the same way. It’s the accumulation of seemingly minor incidents, the subtle shifts in power dynamics, the constant erosion of self-worth, and the systematic deprivation of resources that form the oppressive web. It’s a calculated strategy of domination, designed to instill fear and dependency, rendering the victim powerless.

This article will delve deeply into the anatomy of coercive control, exploring its defining characteristics, the devastating impacts it has on individuals and families – particularly children – and the critical importance of recognising it as a distinct form of abuse. We will also touch upon the evolving legal frameworks and the urgent need for a more informed societal response to this pervasive issue.

Defining the Indefinable: What is Coercive Control?

At its core, coercive control is a pattern of behavior that seeks to dominate and control another person, often through fear, intimidation, degradation, and isolation. It is not a singular event but a course of conduct – a relentless strategy that over time dismantles the victim’s agency.

Leading experts, such as Dr. Evan Stark, who coined the term, emphasise that coercive control is about liberty deprivation. It’s about creating a state of entrapment, where the victim’s ability to act independently, make decisions, or even have a private thought is systematically curtailed.

Key characteristics that define this pattern include:

  1. Isolation: The abuser systematically cuts off the victim from their support networks – friends, family, colleagues, and even access to the outside world. This can involve monitoring communications, fabricating stories to alienate loved ones, or creating situations that make it impossible for the victim to maintain relationships. The goal is to make the abuser the victim’s sole source of information and support, increasing dependency.
  2. Control over Daily Life: This is where the “control” in coercive control becomes most evident. The abuser dictates every aspect of the victim’s life. This might include:
    • Financial Control: Withholding money, demanding detailed accounts of spending, preventing the victim from working, or accumulating debt in the victim’s name.
    • Control over Movement: Dictating where the victim can go, who they can see, when they must be home, or even how long they can take to run an errand. GPS tracking, surveillance, or demanding constant check-ins are common tactics.
    • Control over Communication: Monitoring phone calls, text messages, emails, and social media. Dictating who the victim can speak to or what they can say.
    • Control over Personal Appearance: Dictating clothing, hairstyles, or even hygiene.
    • Control over Health and Wellbeing: Denying access to medical care, dictating medication, or sabotaging healthy habits.
  3. Degradation and Humiliation: The abuser constantly undermines the victim’s self-esteem and sense of worth. This can involve:
    • Verbal Abuse: Constant criticism, insults, name-calling, belittling, and public humiliation.
    • Psychological Manipulation: Gaslighting (making the victim doubt their own memory and sanity), undermining their perceptions, and distorting reality.
    • Public Shaming: Deliberately embarrassing the victim in front of others.
    • Disregarding Feelings: Dismissing emotions, trivialising concerns, or accusing the victim of being “too sensitive” or “crazy.”
  4. Intimidation and Threats: While often not physical, the abuser uses veiled threats, menacing gestures, and unpredictable behavior to keep the victim in a constant state of fear and anxiety. This can include:
    • Threats of Violence: Implicit or explicit threats against the victim, children, pets, or loved ones.
    • Threats of Self-Harm: Threatening suicide or self-harm to manipulate the victim.
    • Damage to Property: Destroying belongings to demonstrate power and instill fear.
    • Display of Weapons: Keeping weapons visible or mentioning their use.
    • Stalking and Surveillance: Unwanted presence, monitoring movements, or using technology to track.
  5. Regulation of Routines and Everyday Life: The abuser establishes strict rules and routines that the victim must adhere to, often seemingly arbitrary or excessive, but designed to maintain control and predictability from the abuser’s perspective. Deviations can lead to disproportionate punishment.
  6. Economic Abuse: This goes beyond just financial control and encompasses any actions that prevent the victim from acquiring, using, or maintaining financial resources. This could be sabotaging job opportunities, destroying credit, or forcing the victim into debt.
  7. Digital Control and Surveillance: In the digital age, abusers exploit technology to extend their control. This includes:
    • Monitoring phone calls, texts, and social media.
    • Installing spyware on devices.
    • Using GPS tracking.
    • Demanding passwords.
    • Threatening to share private photos or information online.

It’s crucial to understand that these behaviors are not random acts of anger but part of a deliberate and persistent strategy by the abuser to exert power and control. They occur in a context of fear and intimidation, even if overt physical violence is absent. The victim’s understanding that the abuser is capable of violence, or has been violent in the past, underpins the effectiveness of these non-physical tactics.

The Devastating Impacts: Beyond the Bruises

The impacts of coercive control are profound and long-lasting, often far more damaging than isolated incidents of physical violence because they dismantle the victim’s very identity.

  1. Psychological and Emotional Trauma:
    • Erosion of Self-Worth: Constant degradation leads to feelings of worthlessness, self-doubt, and profound shame.
    • Anxiety and Depression: Living in a constant state of fear, uncertainty, and hyper-vigilance takes a severe toll on mental health.
    • PTSD/C-PTSD: The ongoing trauma can lead to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or Complex PTSD (C-PTSD), characterised by flashbacks, nightmares, emotional dysregulation, and difficulty forming healthy relationships.
    • Cognitive Distortion: Gaslighting and manipulation can make victims doubt their own memory, perception, and sanity, leading to confusion and self-blame.
    • Loss of Agency: Victims may feel completely unable to make decisions or take action, even when opportunities arise.
  2. Physical Health Deterioration: Chronic stress from living under coercive control can manifest physically, leading to:
    • Sleep disturbances
    • Digestive issues
    • Weakened immune system
    • Chronic pain
    • Increased risk of heart disease and other stress-related illnesses.
  3. Social Isolation: The abuser’s tactics successfully sever the victim’s connections, leading to profound loneliness and a lack of external support necessary for recognition and escape.
  4. Economic Disadvantage: Financial control can leave victims impoverished, unable to secure housing, food, or necessities for themselves and their children, making escape incredibly difficult. Perpetrators can also abuse child support systems.
  5. Impact on Parenting and Child Development: Coercive control profoundly affects parenting capacity and has severe, direct impacts on children, even if they are not directly abused by the perpetrator.
    • Maternal Gatekeeping: The abuser may actively undermine the victim’s parenting, limiting her ability to protect or nurture the children, often portraying her as an inadequate parent.
    • Emotional Availability: The victim, consumed by fear and control, may struggle to be fully emotionally available to her children, inadvertently perpetuating cycles of anxiety.
    • Child’s Trauma: Children living in an environment of coercive control are direct victims of abuse. They witness the degradation of a parent, live in a state of hyper-vigilance, and often internalise the abuser’s distorted view of the world. This can lead to:
      • Anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms.
      • Attachment issues.
      • Behavioral problems (aggression, withdrawal).
      • Academic difficulties.
      • Difficulty with emotional regulation.
      • Developing distorted views of relationships and gender roles.
      • Feeling responsible for the abuse or for their parent’s distress.
      • Suicidal ideation: As highlighted in real-world cases, children exposed to severe coercive control can develop thoughts of self-harm or suicide as a desperate attempt to escape the constant terror and psychological burden.

Coercive Control and the Justice System: A Mismatch

One of the most disheartening aspects of coercive control is its invisibility to traditional legal frameworks, particularly in family courts. Legal systems are often designed to address discrete acts of violence, making it challenging to present a pattern of insidious, non-physical abuse that accumulates over time.

  • Evidentiary Challenges: Proving a pattern of coercive control requires detailed documentation of numerous, often subtle incidents. Victims, already traumatised and isolated, may struggle to provide this evidence. The lack of visible injuries often leads courts to dismiss claims as “he said, she said.”
  • Focus on Physical Violence: If no physical violence is present, or if it’s intermittent, the abuse is often downplayed or misunderstood. The system struggles to grasp that psychological and emotional abuse can be equally, if not more, devastating.
  • “Parental Alienation” Accusations: Abusers frequently weaponise allegations of “parental alienation” or “resist/refuse dynamics” against the victim. They claim the victim is manipulating the children against them, when in reality, the children are reacting to the abusive environment. This tactic effectively re-traumatises the child and victim, shifting blame and diverting attention from the abuser’s behavior.
  • Best Interests of the Child Misinterpretation: Courts, when unaware of the nature of coercive control, may prioritise shared care arrangements based on a superficial interpretation of “children needing both parents,” without recognising that one parent is creating a harmful, high-control environment. This leads to children being ordered back into abusive situations, further damaging their well-being.
  • The “Clean Break” Fallacy: The justice system often aims for a “clean break” after separation, expecting co-parenting to be amicable. However, for a coercive controller, separation does not end the abuse; it merely shifts the arena. The family court becomes the new mechanism through which they continue to control and harass the victim, often using the children as pawns.
  • Lack of Training and Awareness: Many judges, lawyers, and support professionals within the justice system lack specialised training in recognising and responding to coercive control. This systemic blind spot perpetuates harm.

Recognising the Red Flags: A Societal Imperative

Understanding the signs of coercive control is not just for victims but for everyone – friends, family, colleagues, and professionals. Early recognition can be life-saving.

For Individuals:

  • Do you feel constantly monitored or controlled?
  • Are you afraid to express your opinions or make decisions?
  • Has your access to money, transport, or communication been restricted?
  • Have you been isolated from friends and family?
  • Do you feel a constant sense of dread or anxiety about your partner’s reactions?
  • Do you constantly feel like you are walking on eggshells?
  • Are you constantly being criticised or belittled?
  • Do you doubt your own memory or sanity because of things your partner says?
  • Are you having difficulty sleeping, eating, or concentrating?

For Friends, Family, and Colleagues:

  • Has your loved one become withdrawn or distant?
  • Are they always “checking in” with their partner before making plans?
  • Do they seem unusually anxious or fearful?
  • Do they have limited access to their own money or phone?
  • Does their partner constantly text, call, or monitor their location?
  • Do you notice the partner belittling or humiliating them?
  • Are there always excuses for why they can’t meet up?

For Professionals (Medical, Legal, Social Workers, Educators):

  • Repeated, vague complaints: Patients presenting with stress-related illnesses, anxiety, or depression without a clear cause.
  • Disclosures of control: Listening carefully when a parent speaks about control over money, communication, or movements, even if physical violence isn’t mentioned.
  • Child behavior changes: Children displaying sudden anxiety, withdrawal, aggression, or academic decline, especially after spending time with a particular parent.
  • “Parental alienation” alarms: Being critical of “parental alienation” claims and looking for underlying coercive control dynamics.
  • Pattern analysis: Recognising that individual incidents might seem minor but form part of a larger, escalating pattern.

Moving Forward: Advocacy and Systemic Change

Effective response to coercive control requires a multi-faceted approach that goes beyond individual interventions to address systemic failures.

  1. Legal Reform: Many countries have now criminalised coercive control or are moving in that direction. This is a crucial step towards recognising the abuse for what it is and providing legal recourse. However, laws alone are not enough; consistent enforcement and informed judicial interpretation are vital. Coercive control is not a standalone crime in New Zealand.
  2. Professional Training: Comprehensive training for all professionals within the justice system (judges, lawyers, police), healthcare, and social services is paramount. They need to understand the dynamics, impacts, and evidence base of coercive control.
  3. Public Awareness Campaigns: Broad public education is essential to destigmatise the experience, help victims identify their situation, and empower bystanders to offer support. The “web of abuse” analogy is powerful in explaining its complex nature.
  4. Support Services: Accessible, specialised support services for victim-survivors are critical. These services must understand coercive control, provide safety planning, legal advocacy, and psychological support tailored to the unique trauma it causes.
  5. Protection of Children: The “best interests of the child” must be understood through a trauma-informed lens that prioritises safety from all forms of abuse, including psychological and emotional harm, and recognises that exposure to coercive control is child abuse. This means challenging the notion that a child must have contact with an abusive parent when that parent continues to exert control through family court proceedings.

Coercive control is a profound violation of human rights and dignity. It strips individuals of their autonomy and often leaves children caught in a continuous cycle of fear and instability. By understanding its insidious nature, recognising its signs, and advocating for systemic change, we can begin to untangle this devastating web of abuse and pave the way for true freedom and healing. It is only through a collective, informed effort that we can hope to break the invisible chains that bind and protect the most vulnerable among us.